/sci/ - Science & Math

How is Olber's paradox a paradox, when stars do NOT go on forever, but are grouped into sparse finite galaxies?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olbers%27s_paradox
"As more distant stars are revealed in this animation depicting an infinite, homogeneous, and static universe, they fill the gaps between closer stars. Olbers's paradox says that because the night sky is dark, at least one of these three assumptions must be false"


AssTronomers shitting out shit, trying Jewish tricks to get goyim to believe in their Abrahamic creation myth because most people can´t fathom infinity. Obviously there is no paradox. Since the universe is infinite, light from a star infinite lightyears away would have to travel through infinite amount of other stars, planets and gasclouds to reach us. So it would have infinite objects between us and the star to block its light. The paradox is solved through logic on its own premise. You don´t even need to do math. Go look up at the nightsky, you only see stars in our own galaxy with the naked eye. Even according to AssTronomers about 100 galaxies are moving towards Earth/Milkey way. Including the closest one Andromeda. If our nightsky isn´t filled with light from these 100 galaxies, why would it be filled with light from a galaxy infinite lightyears away.

"Brightness
Suppose that the universe were not expanding, and always had the same stellar density; then the temperature of the universe would continually increase as the stars put out more radiation."

An argument for people who can´t understand infinity. Hurr durr I think the infinite static universe is gonna overheat from the infinite amount of stars.

There is no big bang, there is no expansion. That´s just Abrahamic culture given validity through "science". There is just the eternal infinite universe, always have been, always will be.

>>8013092
sorry but I was blinded by too much light