/sci/ - Science & Math

>>6252032
<<<

>>5973877
well, not quite that bad.
but i dont like it when they try too hard. it kinda ruins it, because some people who MIGHT have fallen for it, will end up not doing if there's something obviously very stupid that gives it away as not being a genuine quote.

like the OP's image where they call him "black science man"
it's obviously not a real quote, or at the very least you'd think the person reporting it is a fucking moron, which makes you a lot less likely to trust it.

just have a real picture of him, some fancy font, his real name ,and an almost-believable quote to the very very scientifically illiterate, and that's potential comedy gold right there.

>>5882154

Thanks m8