[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.11601442 [View]
File: 170 KB, 600x455, 1587693892660.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11601442

>>11601396
>no it doesn't are you blind >>11601331
Temperature is rising at the same time CO2 is rising. This is called a correlation.

>no it isn't, where is the evidence.
Right here: >>11600849. Are you pretending to be stupid?

>where is the evidence it is changing in an unprecedented manner
Why are you avoiding the question?

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/GlobalWarming/page3.php
tl;dr current warming is an order of magnitude faster than interglacial warming

>adding the modern data doesn't make the trends correlate you retard. Temperature is flat
>the rate of warming trend is flat over the past 10000 years
Then so is the trend in CO2. Thanks for disproving yourself.

>playing semantic games again you shill.
Please explain how this is a semantic game. You attempted to misleadingly compare an increase over 100 years to a trend over 10000 years. Your deception was revealed immediately and nothing you've said disputes this.

>I never said deny causation I said deny correlation.
I never said you did. Why is correlation even relevant if you already know causation?

>Imagine actually thinking arguing against high CO2 concentration is correlated with the beginning of cooling it is not deniable.
It's meaningless, since you are guessing an arbitrarily chosen level of "high CO2," and it's irrelevant since we already know what causes the beginning of the cooling.

>you have shown no evidence for unprecedented climate change or rate of climate change let alone been able to show any evidence that any change is attributable to actions of mankind
No matter how much you repeat these lies, the evidence is still in the thread for everyone to see:
>>11600553
>>11600849
>>11601041
All you're doing is destroying your own credibility. Please keep repeating your pathetic lies and denying what's right in front of your face. I win every time you do it.

>You deny there has been no increasing temperature trend over the past 10,000 years
Where?

>> No.11596929 [View]
File: 170 KB, 600x455, CS_global_temp_and_co2_1880-2012_V3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11596929

>>11596924
>he question is does higher CO2 concentrations cause higher temperatures.
Yes

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]