/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9742096
holy shit they killed u

>>9408442
ITT: Fucking retards less intelligent than a gorilla.
Honestly if you want to discuss IQ and bash on black people, go back to >>>/pol/ stop bringing this kind of shit over here. I hate when you guys disguise your racist political bullshit with science because it has a term "IQ" in it which by the way doesn't justify talking about the political shit. No idea why this shit is allowed and it's honestly worse and more cancer than avatarfagging will ever be.
That Koko shit is made by autists and /pol/ (which is the same thing by the way) and has very little facts and sources included.
A gorilla is incapable of speaking, asking questions and literally anything basic even a human with downsyndrome is capable of. The only thing it could do was pattern recognitions after a lot of training, it wasn't born with that ""IQ"" and was smart from the beginning like Terrence Tao. That article is nothing but bullshit, they taught him everything and the tasks he was given was similar to those he was taught so his ability to learn was on miniscule scale it's laughable. Meanwhile a civilized black person who is determained enough could get into PhD Theoretical Physics if they were determained. A gorilla couldn't even solve basic arithmetic. This is nothing but bullshit political propaganda, instead of browing /pol/ all day while growing your neckbeard to express your virginity, go invent a time machine and help 3rd Reich become a reality (btw you can't, stop living in your fantasy and adapt to this world).
To give you a perspective of how dumb this debate is, the homepage of everyone in this thread states that the average IQ of a person with autism is around 80-90, so none of you are better. Go back to the zoo you fucking animals.

>>8673855
No U retard, it doesnt work like that. You dont get into orbit by going straight up. Get off this board

Hey /sci/ I have been on this question and wanted to see if my response is valid.
The question is, "Explain exactly what is meant by the statement that 'differentiation and integration are inverse processes'."
My response is "Differentiation is rate of change and integration is rate of change of an accumulation (rate of change of area for a function) which is equal to the function itself."
Am I on the right track or have I totally missed the point?