[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.8556681 [View]
File: 15 KB, 443x332, images (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8556681

>>8556624
I was about to answer this, you did it first mein nigger

>> No.8541834 [View]
File: 15 KB, 443x332, images (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8541834

Brainlet reporting in, is here the brainlet club?

>> No.8539800 [View]
File: 15 KB, 443x332, images (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8539800

Is there a variational principle (like least action) that recover Schrödingers equation?

>> No.8534936 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 15 KB, 443x332, images (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8534936

>>8534617
> I am not exactly comfortable with the way he treats Liebniz notation as a fraction either.

That's because OP did it in a moronic handwavy style, however it's possible to show OPs identity is true:
[math]\frac{d^2 y}{dx^2}=f(y)[\math]
A simples substation of [math]\frac{dx}{dy}=\dot{y}] will lead to
[math]\frac{d \dot{y}}{dx}=f(y)[/math]
[math]\frac{d \dot{y}}{dy} \frac{dy}{dx} =f(y)[/math]

Which as you can see will lead to OPs result. As I said, this a VERY famous did equation in physics, in fact they're equations of motion for an harmonic oscillator if you define [math]f(y)=-ky[/math], where k is a positive real number.

So, yes OPs identity is true, and I have to recognize his skills on problem solving (although he manipulates the equation in a WRONG hand wavy way). But whatever Fourier also lacked formalism in his work. In the end OP is a moron for thinking he discovered something new and also an idiot for lack of formalism.

>> No.8530098 [View]
File: 15 KB, 443x332, images (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8530098

>>8529934
Good advice, I'm geniuses though

>> No.8527516 [View]
File: 15 KB, 443x332, images (4).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8527516

So I saw a thread like that this week and I think it was actually a good idea.

ITT: We share scientific facts. Can be related to any /sci/ area.

>Bonus points for citation link

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]