/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8142227
It's like Nietzche, except without a call for elitism. That would be, of course, a spook.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relationship_between_Friedrich_Nietzsche_and_Max_Stirner

Despite the title of the English translation, Stirner never speaks of the ego himself. His conception of self is an empty one, similar to what Buddist meditation aspires to, and for him you body is just your property - one that you have a lot control over.
Stirner later descibes his ideal version of society, a "union of egoists" which are all concious of each others calculated ways.
Again, I think it's unpractical and als, people are not as concious as Stirner seems to hope.

I'm trying to work out a coherent view of the "Subject" (lets say in a sense Deluze etc.) and self, one that grants me a more pieceful life. I'm strugling with Change, Will and Duty. If anyone is interested in giving rants on fuzzy topics like that, I'd apprechiate it.