/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9917594
You don´t have to send pics of people only. Pics of paintings would be nice to profile too. I like training.

>>9868533
So for the positive approach of proving the objective morality let´s think of it in a concrete way, i mean the concrete moral problem and from this point we abstract to moral in general.

But first we check the terms to use correct definitions in a socratic way.

Objective is an adjective which means that a thought or plan is not only a fortunate one for one person but for all if they are in a healthy condition specifically in their mind.

A moral is a maxim or let´s say an axiom that leads to a practical doing.

So from those definitions it´s easy to conclude what the following synthetic sentence means:
Is there an objective morality?

It´s a maxim that is good for all and they see this if they are healthy.

So for being concrete:
If i don´t steal, can this be good not just for the owner but for me? Besides getting into jail i mean and besides any bad feeling from conscience. Yeah it´s better because i can do the right thing by not living as a parasite. Those parasites die out cause of living from others, i mean if those fall, then thy have nothing, while symbiotic people get what they want by doing it on their own, which means they don´t fall if another doesn´t get what they want.

This is of course not everything but it´s the prove that an objective morality exists if not that every moral is of quality like i described.

>>9852986
So how about some science for the swamphead falling for my pseudopseudoscience trap.

>start to focus on a fucking thesis

>start to focus on a fucking thesis

There exists "forced alterations in an ontogenetical nexus to bring the mutation in the future phylogenetical causal complex".

>Antithesis:

There doesn´t extist an influence from our forfathers forcing will to become something different on our health condition, overall shape and will in movement.