[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12723487 [View]
File: 1.37 MB, 1292x1227, 70412E27-FFE4-44E6-8028-ECA3890AF700.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12723487

I teared up when they announced the landing.

I have so much hope and love for this shitty species. In spite of everything we keep pushing forward.

I love you guys.

>> No.11809536 [View]
File: 1.37 MB, 1292x1227, 1590497462208.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11809536

>>11809217
>>11809227

>The whole point of evaluating the function at a particular point is to get the value of B so that you can say the period is 2pi/B
Thats what I am attempting, I have all the points but when i isolate for B I get back an answer which includes the period "n" a variable I dont have. So the calc is telling me it's impossible no?

Below is the calc answer and the graph, in the graph you can see the wave needs to follow the trajectory of the parabola then break of at the intercept points to then intersect with the valley points. If I add in the equation for B that the calc gives me I can then fine tune the "n" variable to get somewhere close but never perfect, wondering how to isolate this if possible or if it is a lost cause.

https://www.symbolab.com/solver/step-by-step/32000%20%3D%204000sin%5Cleft(b32500%20%2B%200%5Cright)%20%2B%2028000

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/y9pq2s0n7d

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]