/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15695885
Why do pop sci retards like you keep spreading these retarded "muh local hidden variables" analogies even though Bell's theorem and its experiment verifications showed that this is exactly NOT how quantum entanglement works?

>basedjack retard doesn't understand thought experiments
>"b-b-but I did eat breakfast this morning"
Many such cases. Sad.

>>15517552
>determinitards getting so desperate in their cope that they turn to religion
Grasping at straws, lmao.

>>15317684
>ad hominem
>appeal to authority
>another ad hominem
>another appeal to authority
404 - argument not found

Idealism is quintessential NPC worldview. "Look at me, I'm not like the other NPCs!"

>>15211827
The hard problem is threefold: linguistic, epistemological and ontological. You solved none of these three. You are repeating a wikipedia tier strawman and you are incapable of addressing criticism. In analogy to Dennett I will call your position "eliminative idealism" because it is based on denial, not on explanation.

>>15201712
Holy shit, I was actually guessing right. You are too low IQ to know the difference between "some" and "all".

>>8087567
>Actually, systematic observation is what empiricism is defined as.
Thanks for proving that you know absolutely nothing about philosophy.

Things that didn't exist in 1950 that I can see at a glance from my seat

>New smoke detector
>LED lights
>Computer and laptop
>Plasma display
>LCD display
>2 remote control devices
>Surround sound headset and other sound systems
>Modern mobile phone
>Graphical hand calculator
>Modern battery
>Battery charger
>Post-It's
>Modern glue
>Several medicines and supplements
>Several plastics, fibers, alloys, composite materials, ceramics and other magic shit in clothes, furniture, furniture and the walls
>Carbon fiber badminton clubs
>HDMI cable
>Playstation and DS
>Food ingredients and preservers in processed food
>Genetically modified food ingredients
>IKEA manufacturing process furniture and other items
>Element based house construction techniques
>Electronic lock
>Centralized floor heating system
>Modern shaver
>House cleaning supplies
>Several electric identification systems in credit cards and mobilephones
>Modern bills
And that's not even touching what's happening in the computer or outside of the room i'm in right now.

There's probably more than that and I'm just being retarded

Reality is that if I compare how I lived 15-20 years ago even I have difficulties adapting to all the changes sometimes.
It was a fucking miracle when I got my grandma to use a mobile phone and electric grandma monitoring device, had to coax her for that one.

>muh slowing down of tech
Is just a bad meme
The difference is that
>""Fast development" during ""industrial" "revolution"""
Happens over some 300 years depending on who you ask and is nicely summarized into brief history lessons that of the few big points
Then the memer (who is most likely under 20) compares that to his own life where he doesn't remember the first 10 and from the last 9 he just remembers that everyone totally used mobilephones and they are "pretty much the same as they were" . And it's understandable, slow and incremental changes are hard to notice and inventions are hard to pinpoint from stream of newstuff.

Because in special and general relativity time is defined as a dimension, you retarded piece of shit.

>>6948303
>they [mathematical axioms] are completely arbitrary
No, they're not, you dimwitted fucktard. If they were completely arbitrary, math wouldn't work out as perfectly as it does in describing nature. Mathematical axioms are carefully and intelligently chosen to be the minimal requirements for math to do its fucking job in depicting reality.

>Mathematics and science are branches of philosophy.
Maybe in the dark ages. For the last 200 years math and science have been separated from philosophy and there is no reason to change this.