/sci/ - Science & Math

This one shows how my solution to QG is exactly in the form of Higgs' result in his seminal paper.

The main problem is that general relativity describes points in spacetime (called events) but the quantum theory of position is such that position states in a Hilbert space tell you about an object being between two points as opposed to at a single point. This discrepancy in the language of the two theories makes hard to write an equation saying that something from GR is equal to something from QM. I showed how to do it almost ten years ago. Pic shows how my solution to the problem was in the exact same form as Higgs' solution which has been getting him name dropped 10,000 times a day for 50+ years.

Note that the coefficient on my GR stress-energy tensor is the same [math]f^3[/math] that appears in the Planck law energy density by which quantization was initially introduced into physics!

Let me also say something about gravitons. Unless you have a grant that pays you to work on gravitons, there is no good reason to think gravitons exist. The graviton would be the quantized force carrier of the gravitational force but Einstein showed more than 100 years ago that there is no gravitational force. Therefore, since there is no force, one has no good reason to think that a non-existent force would have a force carrier. It is overwhelmingly likely that the reason no one has ever seen a graviton is because they don't exist. It irks me when people say the problem of quantum gravity is about gravitons rather about a method by which to incorporate the elements of two disparate mathematical languages into a single expression (pic rel.)

>>11901878
I did this like eight years ago. The problem of QG is that the type of mathematical objects in quantum theory can't be put to equal the objects from GR in an equation. The problem is that there was no link between the two mathematical languages. Anyone who says the problem is something different than that missed the main thing about why QG is hard.

Pic shows how I exactly followed the protocol of Higgs put forth in Higgs' own seminal two page paper which has been getting name dropped 1000 times a day for 30 years.

People who say "QG means to quantize the Newtonian gravitational Lagrangian," or, "QG means to write the graviton as an analogue of the QED photon," are missing the point of why QG is hard. The point is that a quantum object can't be equal to a relativistic object because the two languages don't support the equals sign between them.

>Quantum Gravity
>https://vixra.org/abs/1506.0055

>Tempus Edax Rerum
>https://vixra.org/abs/1209.0010

>30 Tooker Papers
>https://gofile.io/d/IOOaMw

>>11819064
Dude, I have like 30 papers. The one about the particles is only 4 or 5 pages and it has big pictures in it. If you ask a question that shows you at least looked at, then i will entertain your inquiry.

>>11819066
They aren't wrong. They know it has spin-1 but they don't report it because the USA says such a report would be bad for its national security.

>>11819072
If the particle they found in 2012 has spin-1, then that supports my theory but does not necessarily prove it. On the other hand, spin-1 absolutely, positively rules out the Higgs theory.

>>11819074
To test my theory, they should determine the spin of the particle they found in 2012. Certainly they already did this in the ensuing 8 years. The reason the result is not yet reported is, in my mind, quite obvious.

>>11819091
>people were audibly laughing and throwing the book in the trash when leaving the room
those people are assholes

pic unrelated: it shows how my solution to quantum gravity follows EXACTLY the form of Higgs' own seminal result.

>everyone around him treated him like
You mean like how he went to college and studied well for many years, and then continued studying independently for many more years on top of already being a biological genius? Even when they were all treating him like the way haters always treat the people they hate, even when that person is ANOINTED BY THE HOLY SPIRIT?

Here's a nice infographic that shows how my solution to quantum gravity follows EXACTLY the form followed by Higgs in his famous 2 page paper which got him name dropped 1000 times a day for 30 years.

>>10998839
>Eq's (15-19)
compare what I did in my nice little paper to what Higgs did in his nice little paper

>>10120107
Even if I found a professional for it, they would have to volunteer to kill them for free because I don't have any money.

>>10120252
Is it because we're not on real 4chan and this thing on my computer screen is just my enemy's cuckold fetish of wasting my time trying to disseminate my discovery to those I can reach over the internet? Not saying it is, just wondering. There was one time I sent the same tweet about 5,000 times in a row without getting banned by twitter. Usually they cut you off around 10 or 20.

>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1712.0598
Compare my result to Higgs' seminal result.
>Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons
>https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.508 Higgs is able to exactly write the vector wave equation but he is not able to determine the mass of the Higgs boson, which is the coupling constant that makes the theory have physical significance. In my result, I only said "there exists some maps" and did not say what the maps were, but in my case I did derive the exactly correct coupling constant.

pic related:
>Quantum Gravity
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1506.0055