/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2713056
The vector quantity you talk about, specifies an obeject has mutiple componets. Time, and mass are not vectors, as they only have once component. This has nothing at all to do with the value of a scalar time, or mass.

You are just throughing out unrelated concepts. Try harder.

>>2581052

Even though I largely agree (lol Hillary Cunton) would you please stop using Amerikka?

It makes you and everybody look like a tattooed, 13-year-old pseudo-intel teenager.

>>2219882
Not that Sagan

>>2213002
What eulers question are you talking about?

The ones I gave you were a systems of three coupled differntail equations. In these every parameter depends on every other parameter.
Only time and initial conditions are is independent (naturally).

For certian simmple systems, the equations might reduce and decouple, however that is not the general case.

>Using CERN to decrypt files

BRILLIANT!

22. Richard Feynman

Ain't no otha.

>>1384835

I was unaware they handed out awards for gigantic faggotry.

>>1364787

>>1242854
"Why hire an engineer? Did we run out of illegal immigrants?" - Richard Feynman

YOU GOTTA STOP AND THINK ABOUT IT TO REALLY GET THE PLEASURE ABOUT THE COMPLEXITY... THE INCONCEIVABLE NATURE OF NATURE.

E = mc^2
E = 85kg (my mass) * (300,000^2)
E = 7 650 000 000 000

E = mc^2
E = 120kg (my friend's mass) * (300,000^2)
E = 10 800 000 000 000

E = E

10 800 000 000 000 = 7 650 000 000 000

Explain this shit.

Picture related - he proved E=mc^2 or some shit.