/sci/ - Science & Math

>make a nuclear reactor
>this thing is amazing
>but what about all the waste?
>research what to do with it
>make better reactors that produce less waste
>end up with waste free nuclear energy
Chernobyl was the dark age of nuclear fission, we could have had perfect reactors by now if research had not been halted.

>>10080083
>>10080445
Alright lets examine the context of the question

>will we ever harness the force of gravity

>force of gravity

An acceleration is not a "Force". "Gravity" in the context of this question is an assumption that "gravity" is something to begin with despite no actual empirical evidence of such. How does one "harness" what isn't "harnessable"? How does one harness an acceleration? If you can't answer these two questions then the original question is completely non-sequitur.

>>9868252
Hey, /sci/. I'm a Finance grad student who's taken all his basic probability/statistics in highschool, and understands basic linear regression perfectly well by this point (MLE, Bayesian priors, instrumental factors, etc) but only has a barely workable understanding of time series.

Could someone pls recommend a *relatively* modern enough book on time series that's heavily theoretically intuitive? I can't make heads or tails of the universe of time series models, when to use GARCH models, when SARIMAX, ARIMA, or who knows what other stochastic process.

Really out on a limb here.

How can I motivate myself doing maths daily ?