[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.14585716 [View]
File: 79 KB, 849x824, are-testkits-legit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14585716

>The average OnlyFans creator makes $151 per month

>OnlyFans has 1.5 million content creators

Per year 2.718 Billion flows through only fans predominantly to individuals who have attained low levels of academic success and thus educational training

https://twitter.com/phillipjcoulson/status/1303149863488622592

in the screencap lays out the reality quite succinctly.

---
In early 2020, testkits for a never before seen novel viroid were massed produced, distributed and performed on the masses without so much as a question towards their Type 1 and Type 2 error rates. Having been red pilled on the lowly ethics of 'someone else will do it if i dont' I told everyone in my circle to demand that the test operators provide them with the false positive and false negative rates of the test. All noded their head at me, but litterally zero actually asked. These kits than informed the social zeitgeist for the next two years, where as many, including myself lost their human rights, and had their currency hyperinflate.

How about instead of paying these bitches to shake their tits on onlyfans, we pay them to learn bayes theorem

>> No.12297367 [View]
File: 79 KB, 849x824, are-testkits-legit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12297367

As a citizenry it is within our God given rights to demand from the testers the full bayesian inference for each of the many different test kits deployed. Lumping the results from different tests in the press without these numbers is disingenuous and ill descriptive.

>> No.12098531 [View]
File: 79 KB, 849x824, are-testkits-legit.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12098531

>>12097657
A question I frequently find myself asking as people continue to claim they either have covid or not, based on one test. Did they not receive the bayesian inference? there are many tests kits out there, some supposedly shipped as early as two years ago. They all connect be of the same sensitivity and specificity, yet they are clumped together in the news.

I for one predict that the Corona narrative would bea completely different timeline

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]