/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9737005
>sets are merely seen as an obscure formalism with no real physical meaning
>I would suggest you do the same
No thanks.
>I am talking about the community of people who have dedicated their lives to studying TQFT, i.e. Mathematical Physicists.
I mean, what was the relevance to the previous post? You are just forcing your 'muh cobordism hypo much better than homotopy hypo' which has nothing to do with the post.
>Clearly you disagree, so where are the proofs of this homotopy "hypothesis"
Actually I don't know this stuff and I'm not interested.
>>9737016
This trolling is going beyond control, calm down now.