/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11489125
>all numbers multiplied together = inf

>>11483980
>an infinite amount of 3's
infinity is not a number, it's a philosophical concept. It has no business describing an "amount" of things and the way you're using it is mentally retarded anyway. You're implying "an infinite amount of 3's" exist?
1) prove it. (You wont. (You can't))
2) you're treating "an infinite amount of 3's" like a finite, the same way you'd say an amount of ten, or an amount of one-hundred. An amount is described by a number, but infinity is not a number.
Before you say "no i'm not," first consider that you're implying "an infinite amount" exists, which means you consider it conveniently contained between the quotes surrounding "0.333...". Yet, infinity is unbounded. Infinity cannot be contained.

I bet you wish you were baiting, but you're actually literally just this dumb. Take a nap.

>>11480575
>If you're retarded enough to implement array sorting yourself in a scripting language
the shit smooth cumbrains say