/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15560741

>What does 12 months look like?

Same shit as today but with more makeup.

>>15214130

>sequenced

If then else, huh ... *beep boop*

AI will never replace humans. No amount of AI training would be enough to produce as good art as the most skilled artists for example. It's always just a very poor replication.

Furthermore the fact that something like a piece of art was actually made by a person means something. It gives it more meaning and importance than some computer algorithm.

>>15140816

>ChatGPT

>>15119477

>Name one scenario that doesn't lead to degeneration or extinction of people.

Why should it. A true AGI wouldn't even occupy the same "biological" niche as humans. Some complex but non-sentient algorithm would be much more of a threat because some retard would invariably decide to put such a glorified mechanical Turk in charge of important shit.

>>14951048

>What people call "AI" today is not generally intelligent and will never be generally intelligent.

Bingo.

AI will never be intelligent because it has no awareness, as such it has no motivation, it's all just meaningless numbers.