/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2481849

>the wavefunction represents our knowledge of the system, not the system itself.

To me that sounds like
"wave frequencies of light represents our knowledge of colors, not the colors itself."

So everitime i would refer to the color red you could go like "There is no evidence that`s really red etc."

I think you are falling back onto solipsism here, this isn`t necessarily a wrong position.

But don`t blame people who`ll rather rely on the most elegant interpretation of it that are suggested with various experiments.
Just like you can`t blame someone for thinking that roses are red.

>>2481849

>the wavefunction represents our knowledge of the system, not the system itself.

To me that sounds like
"wave frequencies of light represents our knowledge of colors, not the colors itself."

So everitime i would refer to the color red you could go like "There is no evidence that`s really red "

I think you are falling back onto solipsism here, this isn`t necessarily a wrong position.

But don`t blame people who`ll rather rely on the most elegant interpretation of it that are suggested with various experiments.
Just like you can`t blame someone for thinking that roses are red.

Would a janitor delete this opening post ? ?

Im afraight we have few days left until /sci/ will become the most superannuated message board in the world.

Don`t even try to think about the threads where atheists and nihilists mentally mastrubate each other, while deleting every counter argument.

>>2349195

im already aware that any worldview build up with words is doomed to fail.

actually thats the point where i`m trying to get at with these retarded atheists and nihilists that always swarm around here.

>>2236092

I know it was an argument AGAINST qm you faggot.

He came up with this implementation of qm because it sounds so absurde anyone would agree qm is a condemnable idea.

The more ironicly it is his absurde implemantation, it seems, is how reality actually works.