[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.15977436 [View]
File: 215 KB, 645x1082, 1463236568523.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15977436

>>15977435

>> No.15446063 [View]
File: 215 KB, 645x1082, 1463236568523.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15446063

>>15446059

>> No.15068515 [View]
File: 215 KB, 645x1082, 1463236568523.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15068515

>> No.14703877 [View]
File: 215 KB, 645x1082, 1463236568523.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14703877

>> No.12748963 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12748963

>>12747737

>> No.12699521 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, 1463236568523.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12699521

>>12699464

>> No.12580871 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, 1463236568523.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12580871

>> No.12494532 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, consciousness thread.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12494532

>> No.11962206 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11962206

I've almost never seen a thread deleted on /sci/. Consciousness threads which are almost entirely philosophy always stay up (which I'm not opposed to), but so do all the other shit bait threads that are about something completely unrelated, with the "scientifically speaking" caveat added, which is so common that people must do it ironically now.

I generally agree with OP, at least when it comes to philosophy that is relevant to science, like metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics. Almost all scientific discussion are in essence also loaded with philosophical claims, so it seems silly to outright disallow philosophy.

>> No.10275521 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10275521

Can there ever be a purely physical account of consciousness, /sci/?

>> No.9986073 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9986073

>>9986036
Here is the rundown so far.

>> No.9658471 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9658471

>> No.9584157 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9584157

>> No.8697890 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8697890

I must say it's been a surprisingly non-cancerous thread.

>>8685316
Even though I disagree with almost everything Dennett says about consciousness, it's hard not to like the guy. He's cozy in that same way your grandpa comes across.

>> No.8411333 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8411333

>> No.8079062 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
8079062

>> No.7495417 [View]
File: 216 KB, 645x1082, consciousness.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7495417

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]