[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.10360948 [View]
File: 15 KB, 253x220, ferrocell-image[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10360948

>>10360864
>A pressure of what?
Mass, EM.

>Also, using this pressure theory, explain all observed graviational phenomena.
>condense mass
>it condensates into a planet/sun
>evaporate mass
>you get "space" which is full of the building blocks for mass once again.
Unless you don't believe that boatloads of hydrogen are being ejected from the centers of galaxies, such as quasars.

>>10360872
>get closer to this thing that attracts exponentially as you get closer to it.

Literally magnetic attraction, here's a magnet under a ferrocell.
>That looks like the orbit of mercury.

>>10360875
>Geometrically speaking a line doesn't need to be made of anything to know that it's contained within a an equation in any dimension if you define an origin point.
What is the "origin" of gravity? What is the "origin" or a field? You can define with math, that doesn't make it magically appear there.

>Space is something that can be occupied by anything with volume=/=0 and traveled by anything with speed relative to a fixed point =/=0.

That doesn't make it real. That makes it the privation of something with an actual quality. An absence of properties. You're basically saying the absence of properties is a property which is a fallacy.

What does space turn into when it's not occupied? If it can't be empty then how can it be "space" to begin with?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]