/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8753046
>>8753066
the cognitive dissonance is staggering

>>8753113
literally all this says is that the electoral college is unfair because the Democrats are more likely to win it because they do well in states with lots of people. basically, they're saying that it's unfair for Democrats to win by having more people vote for them. it's like saying a raffle is unfair if someone who paid 5x as much has 3x the chance of winning.
what IS unfair is when the electoral college subverts the popular will by handing the victory to the loser of the popular vote. hmm, who's the beneficiary of that...?

>>8753135
>I did win the argument, I'm sorry my intellect is superior to yours.
Danth's Law applies, you autismal twit.

cirrus clouds illuminated by the sun seen through a gap in altocumulus ("mackerel sky") clouds.
next.

>>8516428 (You)

>>7914380
>increasing CO2 levels promote plant growth and increase crop yields
not this memescience bullshit again...
NIGGA, YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THAT CO2 ISN'T THE LIMITING FACTOR IN THE VAST MAJORITY OF ECOSYSTEMS

>Found this on /x/
ha ha no.

>huffpo
okay, I only ever read huffpo because I know exactly what its slant is, making it easier to adjust for. science reporting is generally tripe anyway. (remember when "hydrogen sulfide plays an important role in immune signaling" somehow became "smelling farts cures cancer"?) and a substandard news source like huffpo is pretty low on the list of places I'd look for interesting science news.

you want to find accurate, interesting write-ups of actual research presented in a manner accessible to the layman? read the NYT or SciAm.