/sci/ - Science & Math

>Interestingly enough, as your finger begins to push in the exact point it is touching on the cube surface, the process is described in rates of time: the rhythem, pattern, rate of change Of, the new and new and new and new location of that finger point in space.
Yet you don't need time to deduce speed or rate of change, even if speed is a ratio of distance/time. What I mean by this is that you can look at a static picture, and for the sake of simplicity we'll pretend we're looking at a bullet breaking the sound barrier. In this case, without looking at multiple frames, I can tell you that the bullet is travelling at 1,239 km/h. Notice that I did not need multiple frames as per your description of the 3d cube. I was able to look at a static picture and deduce speed/rate of change when traditionally it requires two frames (what you called rates of time).