/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8546079
>peer review by a third party

>>8545897
Bullshit

>>8523628
Physicists can barely predict a coin flip and you expect me to believe they can predict it will land on heads half of the time on average?

Good joke

>>8513245
>not likely.
LOL, so you instead of looking at the paper you are just guessing? Are you retarded or just pretending to be?

>Nice baseless assertion.
Wow, so your calling that a baseless assertion when you just admitted you didn't look at the paper yet asserted it contained no data.

>You are forgetting I posted a screenshot of the first page with the text highlighted that plainly states that GPS doesn't use Relativity.
And then I posted two papers pointing out how that specific paper is wrong.

>Dood, I didn't read ANY of it, fucktard.
Yeah, so not only did you lie, you also lost the argument since you can't respond to something you neither understand nor read. Loser.

>>8503396
>on the politics board

>>8477028
>Philosophy is literally just science without labcoats.

>>8469971
>Literally the only argument there is for global warming is "muh consensus."
Yeah it's not like there are entire textbooks devoted to explaining how AGW works and the evidence for it. They just say "consensus" over and over again.

Wew lad

>>8417130
That really activated my almonds!

>teaching physics according to its historical development

When did you realize physics majors were brainlets, /sci/?

>>8408617

>>8400440
>He doesn't know what Euclidean means but still posts as if he does

>>8328088
>Mind expanding psychedelics?
Your mind expanded so much it popped.

>>8318445
>Chances are it either replicates the effects that the universe as a whole used to create itself from nothing to generate the excess energy or there is some effect on distant matter in the universe and/or some new field we don't know of (dark energy?) shooting out the back.
t. typical memedrive supporter

>>8318339
>I visit /x/

>>8279739
>gambling is random you can't apply mathematical principles to it
Yeah, if only there were some form of mathematics that dealt with random results... Oh well, I guess we'll have to wait for another Yokizuna of Mathematics to figure that one out.

The only way to win in gambling is for a casino to make a mistake. But even if they do you probably aren't smart enough to find it.

You are a biologist traveling in the rainforest. You are bitten by a poisonous snake. Luckily, you know that the antidote for this poison is secreted by the female of a certain species of frog native to this rainforest. You remember that females and males of this species look exactly the same, and can only be distinguished by the distinctive croaking of the male. You also remember that the population is split evenly between females and males. Amazingly, you spot a frog of this species in front of you. At the same time you hear the distinctive croak of a male of the species behind you. You turn around and see two frogs where the croak came from. You are starting to fade out and only have enough time to run to the frog in front of you and lick it or to the frogs behind you and lick them. Which choice will maximize your chance of survival?

>>8182402

>>8134953

>>8110449
Holy shit, you just blew my mind anon. At first I thought that "you can be right for the wrong reasons" could be said in a single sentence. But you've shown me that it can be said in several paragraphs, after spending several years studying philosophy. Thank you so much for enlightening me.

>>8110452
I predict you will be you. See, I can perfectly predict everything.

>>8108304
The term "Copenhagen interpretation" was not used to describe it until the 50s, you absolute moron.

>>8097967
>learning math beyond analysis

>>8082722

>>7988177
And this "chess" they speak of must be soem kind of Jewish popularity contest!