/sci/ - Science & Math

Huh. This thread certainly devolved. Kinda tl;dr, but I got an overview.

So what's the controversy? Are some here actually arguing that the status quo is sustainable? The every ecological sector on the planet ISNT in decline? That social stratification produces societal aberrance? That structural violence is the main cause of behavioral violence? That the world is corrupt as shit? Epigenetics?
ect ect

Or are we simply outraged at anything that moves beyond a critic and attempts (even poorly) to field some new direction to address these and many more issues?

Lets be a bit more rational about this.

>>2382451

...Easy does it princess. No reason to flip a switch. Precisely how much documentation do you require of malicious intent? Or the inherent destructiveness of the ruling climate of the market paradigm?
If you settle your objections, perhaps we could go somewhere with this.
We're not dealing with political and economic abstractions (a soft science at absolutely best), we're talking measurable, real world effects of policy and trade.

Also, to OP's credit, its well known trading giants harvest the best and brightest. I believe Time ( not sure of that one ) did a survey that asked if it weren't for the money, would these students choose to work in finance- almost all said no.