[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.5224697 [View]
File: 168 KB, 602x485, emma-stone-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5224697

I would guess in this direction

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_%28mathematics%29#Properties

>> No.4589406 [View]
File: 168 KB, 602x485, emma-stone-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4589406

>>4589249
every polynomial p(x) of degree n really is p(x)=(x-a)(x-b)...
(fundamental lemma of algebra)

I read "Q[x] <x-3>" as the set of polynomials "q(x)(x-3)^m", where q is any polynomial with coefficients in Q and m is any positive integer. That works out with {f(x)|f(3)=0} since the polynomial "q(x)(x-3)^m" (like for example "(x-4/9)(x+6)(x-3)) has 3 as zero.

x^2-1=(x+1)(x-1), so +1 and -1 are the zeros of Q[x]<x^2-1>

>> No.4336362 [View]
File: 168 KB, 602x485, emma-stone-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4336362

>>4336342
>>4336348
the point is that Mathematica should compute the exact result. Clearly, the function has complex values before 0, but the integral should never see them.

Have you tried not typing 0.5, but 1/2 OP?

>> No.4184962 [View]
File: 168 KB, 602x485, emma-stone-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4184962

>>4184934
It's Christmas morning after all. I for one just don't like these "number problems". However, as I said in the thread 2 days ago I think the idea is very good to post a question or theme on the fron page!
Anyway, I'll make a start and draw a picture

>> No.3343996 [View]
File: 168 KB, 602x485, emma-stone-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3343996

>>3343974
you could just solve it...

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=DSolve[%281-y[x]%29%2Bx+y%27[x]%3D%3D0%2Cy[x]%2Cx]

but that was of course not the point of the thread.

>> No.3321534 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 168 KB, 602x485, emma-stone-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3321534

I'm studying physics and I love me some artsy chicks.

>> No.3312390 [View]
File: 168 KB, 602x485, emma-stone-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3312390

>>3312359
lol
I mean "why" not +varepsilon, instead of -varepsilon

>> No.2979771 [View]
File: 168 KB, 602x485, emma-stone-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2979771

help in what sense?
find your purpose in life?
I can't tell you what job you'll do...
Stay Calm and do the things you like. My best/worst advice.

>> No.2966730 [View]
File: 168 KB, 602x485, emma-stone-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2966730

furthermore:
hypotetically, can there exist a (black hole like) singularity without particles in it?
Like a moving black hole wave?

>> No.2927623 [View]
File: 168 KB, 602x485, emma-stone-5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2927623

As you can see in this plot
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28x%2B1%29^2%2B%28y-3%29^2%3D%3D10
the centre is at M=(-1,3) (above and left from (2,2)).
so the tangent y=kx+d has to have positive k, not -3.
It turns out to be +3:

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Solve[%28x%2B1%29^2%2B%28y-3%29^2%3D%3D10%2Cy]

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=D[3+-+Sqrt[9+-+2+x+-+x^2]%2Cx]%2F.{x-%3E2}


(there might be a less explicit calculation than what I did)

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]