/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12205596
>>12205625

the Minnesota study doesn't say what you think it does.
the only people who care enough to try and study this dumb shit are /pol/acks whose entire sense of self-worth revolves around being Better Than Them Negroes because they've got dick-all to feel proud about otherwise.

take your edgy funposting to a board that cares.

hello /pol/
goodbye /pol/

>>>/pol/

>>9827267
but I bet you can easily find the Australian Aboriginal in a room full of sub-Saharan Africans, huh?

>He lied about research to boost his political agenda.
huh?
>gould lied about negro skulls
>modern science shows blacks have on average smaller brain size than white people
oh, it's /pol/acks being salty about their sad little cult not being taken seriously any more

sage and move on

>>9735693
>A warmer, more forgiving climate ripe with fruit, game and arable land does not place the same emphasis on creative problem solving as does a cold, unforgiving climate lacking in food and arable land.
If you think warmer = more forgiving, you should probably neck yourself. While most of Europe may have harsher winters than most of Africa, the dry seasons in sub-Saharan Africa is just as much of a challenge to survive from a hunter-gatherer perspective.
As for the availability of prey, central African game animals tend to be both larger and faster than those found in Europe. And no, the savannas and rainforests of the continent do not have fruit dangling off every branch like you seem to think; just like anywhere else with lots of grazing/browsing predation, physical and chemical defenses are common, and fruits are smaller and less nutritious than modern (domesticated) tropical fruits.

Yours is the response stormfags always come up with, and it's based in a delusional misunderstanding of African physiography. It's a literal made-up story, and yet it's the only attempt at an explanation they have. Ah well, they're nothing if not predictable.

>scientifically proven
say it all you like if it makes you feel better

>>9297114
>the heat island thing is not only in cities, it occurs also in every rural repeated query measurement
yawn. Hausfather et al. (2016) found that the UHI effect is localized only to developed areas, and that the homogenization techniques used to control for it do effectively remove the bias from the overall data set.
>http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015GL067640/full

try making claims that haven't been repeatedly debunked next time.

>>>/pol/

>>8935792
>>8935806
>PERMISSIVE IMMIGRATION POLICY IS ANTI-SCIENCE BECAUSE THEM MEXICANS DON'T SCIENCE HURR
found the acoustic /pol/ack
just watch, he won't be able to resist the compulsion to reply and call me a libtard or tell me to go to tumblr or something.

(by the way, splitting your shitpost into two posts so you get 2x the (You)s? absolutely genius)

>>8928305
>Let me explain something to you: if you publish a research project in a journal, that project is not your thesis. How is that hard to understand? Now, if she had written her thesis FIRST and then condensed it into a journal article, while lazy, that doesn't change her thesis - it is already done and passed. However, if she takes an article that she wrote and published and makes a thesis out of that this thesis will not pass muster. A thesis has a research / knowledge gap that you are filling in. That is the point. If the research has been done in the past - EVEN BY YOU - that gap has been filled in.
It is common, perhaps even ubiquitous, to publish several papers based on aspects of a larger project, and then to publish the results of the larger project as one's dissertation. You can't make a dissertation out of one journal paper, generally, but that's because there's not enough substance, not because of some arcane rule about whether something has already been published.
Are you even a grad student? Or are you LARPing?

>>8868937
>>>/pol/
take your middle school-tier funposting elsewhere

>>8766361
>>8766401
Not An Argument™

>>>/pol/itelyfuckoff

>>8653801
>ignorant /pol/ opinions
>gets laughed at
>"I'm not from /pol/, I'm the REAL /sci/!"
>youhavetogoback.bmp
>"normies gettout REEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
>gets laughed at some more
>continues to shit his pants with rage every time someone references /pol/
every single day, three threads per day

>>8621745
mexicans obviously.

>>8575751
basically because different groups haven't been reproductively isolated for long enough. there MIGHT be a rationale for splitting Native Australians and Maori into one taxon and all other extant humans into another, since they seem to have been isolated since ~50kya, but the divergence of East Asian/Native American, Caucasian/South Asian/Middle Eastern, and Sub-Saharan African lineages is relatively recent, and there's been intermarriage between those three groups since before recorded history.

the other reason is that there ARE other subspecies of Homo sapiens (beyond our own, H. s. sapiens) such as H. s. idaltu and arguably H. s. neanderthalensis (though recent mDNA studies tend to support putting it in its own species within Homo). If we wanted to further subclassify H. s. sapiens, we'd need to designate infraspecies or landraces or something, and there's really very little point in doing that given how blurry the boundaries are and given how it would really serve no purpose but to piss people off.

let's not let this thread get out of control. the /pol/esmoker who started it probably isn't interested in a serious debate and just wants to rant about how (((science))) doesn't agree with his
>muh opinuions

you gots ta go back

ᎩᏅᏌ ᎻᎪᏙᎬ ᎢᎧ ᏀᎾ ᏴᎪᏟᏦ

>>8523239
>>8523261
I think I have bingo!

>If climate alarmism was actually knowledge, it could be explained and understood in layman's terms. Propaganda like this pretends to do so, but it misleads from beginning to end.
o I am laffin

>>8506012
>I seriously doubt a wobbly orbit is the source of ice ages, it is the gradual cooling of the planet and they will become far more common over geological time as the record - the real science - seems to indicate.
I've seen this batshit idea put forth several times on /sci/ and I'm starting to suspect that it's all just one guy with a babby-tier understanding of planetary energy balance. he basically thinks that because the Earth is slowly cooling, we're seeing more and more ice ages and there's nothing that can be done about it.
this idea is only plausible if one remains entirely ignorant of the multiple "Snowball Earth" episodes of the Proterozoic.

>>8459391
>I don't like what he said therefore SJW SJW SJW!
le back le to le >>>/pol/

>>8460397
nigga we have creationists etc. on the House SST committee

>Red pill me

>>8044175
spotted the salty /pol/ack
Begone! By dint of my Jewish powers, I banish you to your containment board!

inb4 shitstorm

it's gonna be /pol/ tinfoil and falseflagging predictions of doom all the way down...

this is how the world ends; not with a bang, but with a shitpost

>>7754092

>>7690575
That's a mighty /pol/ idea bro
>>>/pol/
>>>/pol/
>>>/pol/