/sci/ - Science & Math

Why in your opinions do the results of the "double slit" experiment change depending on whether or not the Electrons (truthfully neutrons) are observed?

>>1557023
It's not logic that says it's in every single spot, it IS in every single spot, as shown by the double split experiment. In essence the double split experiment involved having 2 different paths an particle could follow which would both end up with it impacting with a screen (on which it's impact was recorded) now traditionally you would expect the particle to just follow one of the paths and all the particles you fired would end up in one of two spots (at the end of each of the paths) but instead there was an interference pattern (pic related) which means the particles travelled as waves, and the two waves interracted with each other (where the trough of one waves meets the peak of another there is a 0% probability of a particle landing there, and where a trough of a wave meets the trough of the other wave there is a high probability of a particle landing there.)

hey /sci/ I have a question for you

What matter particles has the double slit experiment been done with?

I know it has been done with electrons, what about neutrinos?

Further what about the single particle double slit experiment, where you send just one particle at a time. Has this been done with something else than photons and electrons?