/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8232667
>If think /pol/ is retarded then you're an SJWtard.
lel

The problem is /pol/ can't tell the difference between social science and population genetics. They conflate different concepts in order to fit their own narrative.

>Researcher publishes a paper about a gene that has an 8% chance of introducing certain molecules into a person's smell. The paper doesn't say anything about the distribution of the gene throughout different human populations (later research finds that said gene is found world wide at varying low percentages).
>pop-sci articles publish "news" about the paper saying that scientist found the gene that makes people smelly.
>/pol/esmokers make infographic pictures about how this research explains "why Indians smell". In doing so they make countless leaps of logic.
>Later they post the infographic on /sci/ and get summarily ridiculed on several points to which they respond with: "Only SJWtards like you make autistic posts like yours with literally no context, evidence but with pure buttmad."

Sorry bro, no one is going to publish a research paper about how a group of retards on the internet can't properly read or interpret scientific research.

pic related, what /pol/ actually believes.

ITT ridiculously bad examples of scientific ignorance in the public.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/449525268529815552