[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9372011 [View]
File: 16 KB, 362x436, 31ESrmEz0-L.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9372011

>> No.7284311 [View]
File: 16 KB, 362x436, 1231312.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7284311

Is this a meme books like SICP over on /g/?

If not, what do I need to know before I can get into it? I looked at some excerpts and it seems pretty complex.

>> No.7182436 [View]
File: 16 KB, 362x436, 31ESrmEz0-L[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7182436

Hey /sci/, here's the deal. I've taken and learned (pretty poorly) calculus up to multivariable/vector calculus and linear algebra. However with the summer coming up, I have an opportunity to hunker down for a few months and do math. My goal is to be in a position to do well in higher level classes, participate in a few math contests (not that contest math is similar to classroom or research math, i just find it fun) and maybe end up applying to grad school. Right now I'm working through How to Prove It at a calm pace but I'm thinking I want to go through a book that will toughen me up and help me develop the fundamentals. What's a good book for doing that? This one (Spivak)?

>> No.7039657 [View]
File: 16 KB, 362x436, 31ESrmEz0-L.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7039657

What's so good about this book? I'm considering getting it, about to take my first calc course. Feel free to share any other suggestions
also, general books thread

>> No.6961856 [View]
File: 16 KB, 362x436, 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6961856

Spivak

>> No.6934995 [View]
File: 16 KB, 362x436, 31ESrmEz0-L.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6934995

I am trying to buy pic related, but it's been sold out of nearly every online bookseller I can find for at least two weeks. Does anyone know where I can buy it from, or why there is such a shortage? Is there a new revision being published soon, or what am I missing here?

Thanks /sci/ you are fantastic

>> No.6460313 [View]
File: 16 KB, 362x436, spivak.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6460313

I like it.

>> No.6132283 [View]
File: 16 KB, 362x436, yellowpigs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6132283

I have a lot of math books but this is the only one of which I'm truly fond.

>>6132130
For all of their faults I think Ravi's notes are better. It would still be nice if G&W finished the second volume sometime soon so there would be a bound book that one could recommend.

>> No.5912396 [View]
File: 16 KB, 362x436, spivak.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5912396

There is something about limits that is bugging me, /sci/.

When proving that <span class="math">\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}f\left( x\right)=\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}f\left( x^3\right)[/spoiler], I'm missing the justification for this step.

Basically, from assuming that
<span class="math">\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}f\left( x^3\right)[/spoiler]
exists, we say that
<span class="math">if 0 < \left| x\right| < \delta^{3}, then 0 < \left| x^{1/3}\right| < \delta[/spoiler]
and thus
<span class="math">\lim _{x\rightarrow 0}f\left( x\right)[/spoiler]
exists as well. How was that step justified?

>> No.1107375 [View]
File: 16 KB, 362x436, spivakcalc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1107375

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]