/sci/ - Science & Math

If you expand an infant's cranium, will the infant's brain grow to fill the slightly larger cranium size?

>>6070259
If space is infinite, then how can you bend it?

Checkmate, atheists.

How far away does one need to be from a nuclear explosion to be able to watch it and not go blind or burned?
I keep thinking of those "tourist detonations" murrica made back in the day.

All the planets would start a free fall in a kinda straight line. Light dies out after 8 minutes, heat soon after.

I'd give humanity a month.

I got this Sagan far out idea, hear me out:

We take half the mass of the sun as a ball, from center out until we have half the mass and teleport the smaller ball away.
The leftover hollow sun would collapse?
Would the small teleported ball keep burning?

I've taken QM courses, but I never learned about quantum entanglement. What I know is only from pop-sci articles.

Basically, when two entangled particles are created if one is in a certain state then at that exact moment the other particle is necessarily in the opposite state, almost as if they were communicating with one another.

Discussion of this topic in the realm of pop-sci is often accompanied by talk about violation of relativistic causality. However, I don't see why any sort of connection would be required to explain this phenomena. For example, if you put egg timers set to the same time in two cars they would go off at the same time, without any communication between the two.

What about dying of age? No-one is immortal.

Wait, so...

Permanent infertility is caused by shit like diseases, scarring, trauma, ect. to the testicles and or surrounding areas. What about increase in scrotal temperature? Is that permanent or temporary infertility?

>>4641672
I could do something indeterminably chaotic.

Kinetic bleeders in the augment.

>>4524626
I respect those who like keeping /sci/ "pure". However, that doesn't override my want of discussing topics that interest me with my favorite 4chan board.

>We can sage if we want to,
>We can leave this thread behind,
>Cause this thread's not /sci/
>And if its not /sci/
>Well its no thread of mine

>>4399788
>that doesn't justify it
Yeah it does. They have a fucking PhD. They are allowed to be douche bags and we can't do anything about it other than get PhD's ourselves.

We've all been there, I am there now.
What education to take.

I'm trying to figure out what will be needed in the future. Right now my guess is phyclogists because stress and first world problems.

Any elder lab-guys with a tip or two for what to choose?

We've been talking about Robert Langdon in tehnology history.

Is he one of a kind? Or is he really like Karl Marx?

>>4177783
>Did somebody say BABIES?
Yes, someone mentioned babies, but talking about them would be nonetheless off-topic.

What are some good college educations with set requirements and structured work?

I really need to get told what to do.

Imagine you can't get a college home.
Can't afford a flat out on the private market.
You don't have anywhere to live and do your studies.

What would you do?
What could be a temporary solution?

If it is cheaper to have women hired...
The why don't all the worlds companies only hire women?

no OP

surgery is not a new invention

people have been removing appendixes for ages

they were performing some pretty sophisticated surgeries for thousands of years, surgiers much more complicated than simple appendectomies

Dear /sci/

Why do we need exams??

>>3146320
Personally I think his ideas are a bit far fetched.
But then again, that seems to be the first opinion on almost all the geniuses in history.

How does science explain this? I dont understand the behavior...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjyqGnWGftE&t=1m02s

>>3091286

Oh gee, what makes you think that?
Nothing is impossible if you have dreams and the will to work towards them!
For Science and Profit!

> exam time
> shitty nervous
> "oh gawd i never gonna pass this"

Any of the elders of /sci/ got some tips for the youngsters?