/sci/ - Science & Math

Consider the Following: The kid being discussed in this thread is out there somewhere pushing his future prospects along, while everyone in here is just sitting and complaining about him, while you all could be studying or pushing your own future prospects along.

But you won't because unlike the kid, you only have an interest in looking 'smart', not actually being it.

>>5316079

>mermaid
>christians:1
>9gag
>odd perspectives in picture

Next time be a bit more subtle.

>>4629166
>he doesn't have a reactions folder
You new?

>>4280952
When will you ever need to convert shit to hex manually?
never.

Hey /sci/, can you explain to me why every time I say I want to be an aerospace engineeri I get a "hurr-durr but dey shut down space lololol" response?

pic related, its my face every time.

>>3938853
If no one is observing the tree, was it even there to start with?

>>3134219
>mfw I realized 300k starting with a Ph.D in mathematics was just a lie.

ITT: you try to explain something difficult to an inebriated man that can barely type the captcha.
prove your intellect through teaching!


Not relativity or some other easy shit, though.

>How the shit do I find x?
>x==33

What is the answer to this?
x=-7

i know it has to do with i, but i can't figure this out, explain plz?

how do you find how many oxygen atoms are in .012 g of CaCO3 (chalk)?

>>1294391
>reverse engineering of the brain will be done soon
>you can theoretically be transferred into a robot and live forever

>>1208483
>Implying you can interact with video streams

>>1188103

>>1161429

>>1158082
>>1158103
>>1158129

>>1121276
wikipedia
>Thus for a 2 m (6.6 ft) diameter tube, the water would rise an unnoticeable 0.014 mm (0.00055 in). However, for a 2 cm (0.79 in) diameter tube, the water would rise 1.4 mm (0.055 in), and for a 0.2 mm (0.0079 in) diameter tube, the water would rise 140 mm (5.5 in)

use a .2 mm tube 100 mm high
repeat
???????
profit

you can all suck my nobel prize winning balls