/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12728905
Oh shit. I finally found it.

https://web.archive.org/web/20201007171625/http://handsonapologetics.com/Miracolo%20Euaristico_Eucharistic%20Miracle.PDF

mfw cant speak spaghetti

>>11048083
Imagine surviving, evolving and reproducing for millions of years, then this anon gets born and decides to abstain from reproduction because he thinks he's "transcending" humanity

I feel bad for every living creature that lead up to your existence

>>10596881
Who deems them "competent"? Themselves? Secularized meta-physicians all of them.

>>10596912
Yes. When you make up shit in your dumb fuck group think hivemind and conspire to make it truth in order to continue getting paid, that would be a conspiracy. What isn't a "conspiracy" to be out of this groupthink and call it out for what it literally is.

>>10596927
What do you think "science" is? If you think it's about "settling" things then you're either misinformed or ill-informed.

>>10596936
>>10596940
The earth "warms" and "cools" creating a pressure mediation and therefore change. This has absolutely nothing to do with humans. It has to do with the earth and sun and a plethora of other cosmic mechanics.

>>10472962
>Good, sit in the corner until you're called back to the table.

>literally trying to argue over nothing

>>10449942
same bro

>>10429632
>idk just don't be a piece of shit waste of space?
Why? Tell me faggot. That is literally philosophy. You have to have a *reason* why you believe that. Something greater than "oh just do it because other humans do". Yeah well why do they do it?

>I take a look around at the world, and I think "Hard work? Seems good" with a thumbs up to match.
Yeah, you take a look at something greater than yourself and imitate it. Congratulations, you just proved you have a philosophy that practice. You could work out the "why" a little more, but we all start somewhere.

>But no I guess everyone must have the same unmotivated perspective as you do.

Did you even read what I said?

>>10429610
>What condition is this?

The human condition.

>>10208718
Thx for the help buddy, if I could ask another question. I have it in my notes that if two Hermitian operators commute, we can choose them to be simultaneous eigenvalues, but what exactly does that mean?

>>10204792
>being dumb enough to read a straw man argument that's the length of a book.

Never changed the measurements of the skull...

Next year I'm starting with physics I and Calculus II, I barely know anything of both. What books would you recommend so I can I study on vacations?