/sci/ - Science & Math

anyone who believes that a skyscraper would crumble into dust as it collapsed because of anything other than a directed scaling energy weapon directed at is a complete fool.

it wasn't destroyed by controlled demolition or as a result of the burning jet fuel (which mostly burned up within the first 3-5 minutes of the explosion at the very most).

the buildings don't merely fall at free fall speed: they are pushed towards the ground into their own foot print and dissolving into powder (both steel and concrete) on the way down.

it is a shame how low the quality of the dialogue is about this particular subject on either side of the fence: the main reason being that in order to understand the true magnitude of the effects that were observably in play on that date require a fairly advanced understanding of material science and theoretical physics well beyond that of even a typical university education.

i am no longer convinced that it is important that we truly understand the mechanism at play on that particular date, and its relationship to many more recent contemporary "disasters". i see this as a decisive evolutionary marker for each and every individual on the planet. how you see reality specifically informs which direction you are growing towards, and whether you get caught up in the unofficial "conspiracies" or the official doctrine one is enslaved to their particular viewpoint.

it is clear to me that the world is a much stranger place than most of us are willing to admit, and i for one am well aware of my ignorance. i am here to observe and learn, not to make definitive assertions about reality. as it stands now, i am not sure than many of us are truly ready for the ramifications of the true nature of human existence.