/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11048950
>False, it doesn't specifically say that THE 968th lesson will improve his playing, but that the 968th lesson will DEFINITELY improve his playing,
so it is between whether the 968th lesson itself is what improves him, or whether you need 968 lessons to definitely improve
>which it implies it's already improved upon and the 968th lesson is not a requirement
what the fuck? no, what sort of interpretation is this?

if anything it is uncertain because of the ambiguity in whether it is the number of lessons or the lesson itself

this >>11048877 is a retarded/dishonest answer, because we have already been told his utility lies in improving his playing, with no restrictions stated -- so it unfair to suddenly say that he not only wants to improve playing, but also wants to improve it FAST.