/sci/ - Science & Math

the best part is when the high iq rando randomly figured it out one night while all the brainlet mathematicians who devoted their life to studying math screeched how they got it wrong. just goes to show iq means everything.

>>11832405
okay

*takes hat off the fan*

What is the evolutionary purpose of evolution?

if the earth slowly began to spin to a point significantly faster than before, would we even notice? Or would our perception of time shift with it?

Also, I'm not asking if there would be any other side effects of the earth spinning faster that we might notice, so don't answer that, or i will reply rudely, calling you a name.

Physics here
If a rocket goes straight up with an acceleration of a=2,25 m/s^2 and the engines go off when it hits a height of 525m, how would I go about calculating its max height?

Seems pretty basic but I'm blanking right now

>>10930469
kanazawa irredeemably btfo. lmao. thanks for this poast, fren.

>>10782732
well a is first letter number 1 and b is 2 so max (a,b) is 2

If there an unlimited number of universes with an infinite number of universes does that mean there is one where OP isn't a faggot?

No Anon, it's you mathtards who are the brainlets. It's a fundamental law of Newton that everything is linear. QED

>>10185878
Someone want to explain Rogo's Basilisk? Why does thinking about it make it more real?

If we needed to travel to a star several light years away from Earth, it would take hundreds of thousands of years with traditional technology, so why don't we just convert ourselves to light, travel there, and then convert back? It would cut travel time down to a minimum.

>>10130177
I fucking new it

If I had a super Turing machine, then could non-constructive proofs be constructive?

hey /sci/ what is your favorite number?
mine is 456 because i won the guess how many jellybeans in the jar game so many times with it