/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10146665
Can't you read properly?

>>8090253
>So according to ou, science is determined by what side of the political spectrum you're on, instead of actual facts? That's a shame.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fys5Z63xCvA

>http://www.smokescreens.org/secondhand-smoke-firsthand-lies/

>http://www.smokescreens.org/chemistry.htm

Tobacco industry funded scientist find no harm caused by the tobacco industry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Enstrom

>http://downtrend.com/robertgehl/weve-been-lied-to-second-hand-smoke-does-not-cause-cancer

>While I find this one to be wrong about the high lung cancer rates (again, multiple risk factors) it also came to the same conclusion.

>http://m.jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/105/24/1844

>The part that says smoking causes cancer is fatally flawed but the part that says second-hand smoking doesn't cause cancer (uh... sort of...) is totally unassailable.

That's some top-notch cherry picking.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44330/

If water condensate at low temperature you could run a deep sea water heat exchanger on one side and normal air on the other side and get clean fresh water or it would be too expensive?