/sci/ - Science & Math

Heh you guys never learn aren't you?

>>8780229
actually /sci/ is where people defend it the most, and best
people show links, sources, citations, figures
people debunk your sources and figures, over and over again

but i am trying to understand why /pol/ fears AGW, its implications, so they choose to minimize it, divert attention from it

just trying to understand

>>8759603
shit, wrong image.
Reminder right here kids.

>>8673968
>>8673965
>>8673911
If only you knew how many times we've had this thread.

reminder.

stop replying to denialists. ignore them. you wouldn't give the time of day to a creationist or a flat earther would you?

>>8667631
This. I can't tell if it's different /pol/e-up-the-butts, or the same ones are switching tactics, but we've had 3 or 4 climate threads going simultaneously for the last month.

>>8652600
>>8652606
We have this thread every day.

global warming thread simulator save your time and energy

>>8631062
>>8631263
>>8631135
>>8631187
ur fagets

>>8629707
>>8629709
>>8629731

every time

>INB4

>>8623905
>>8623909
>>8623962
>>8623958
So it begins:

>>8621597
This.
We've had this thread 6 times this week, and we've become exceedingly efficient at them.

>>8615941
>>8615923
Also, the entire concept that CO2 levels were higher in the past is laughable as an argument against AGW, for the reason that these periods of increased CO2 atmospheric levels are correlated with mass extinction level events, such as the Permo-triassic extinction event, which was the worst of the mass extinction events in Earth history:
http://www.pnas.org/content/111/9/3316.abstract
>The extinction occurred between 251.941 ± 0.037 and 251.880 ± 0.031 Mya, an interval of 60 ± 48 ka. Onset of a major reorganization of the carbon cycle immediately precedes the initiation of extinction and is punctuated by a sharp (3‰), short-lived negative spike in the isotopic composition of carbonate carbon.
The CO2 linked to the increased atmospheric levels in the Permian is likely from massive volcanic eruptions from Siberia, commonly known as the Siberian traps. It took millions of years for life to recover from this natural extinction event.
90% of all species died during this extinction event, keep that in mind. We are currently living in an anthropogenic extinction event caused by human activity, and it's only going to get worse due to climate change.


Other extinction events correlated with increased atmospheric CO2 include the Triassic-Jurassic extinction event:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/340/6135/941

Are you really going to continue to push your feelings-based "CO2 was higher in the past!" narrative again, despite all the evidence I have presented?

>8582777
>global temperature has been in flux before dinosaurs roamed the earth
>>8582780
>It's unlikely that humans are the cause.
>>8582796
>isn't this surface air temperature data all fabricated?
>8583461
>You mean like from the toilet?
>>8584782

Have your BINGO card ready!

>>8582361

CALLING ALL ENGINEERS, CHEMISTS, STATISTICIANS, EARTH SCIENTISTS

ITT: We discuss plausible, economically viable solutions to tropospheric warming and ocean acidification.

The two most popular flavors are solar radiation management (SRM) and carbon dioxide removal (CDR).

CDR my be required for curbing ocean pH and the jury is out on iron fertilization. The impact on marine fauna has already been substantial.