[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.14682153 [View]
File: 35 KB, 742x426, NASA_budget_linegraph_BH.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14682153

>>14682131
>NASA budget in 2021 constant dollars (millions)
>1966 - $49,551
>2020 - $23,621

>Since its inception, the United States has spent nearly US$650 billion (in nominal dollars) on NASA.

>> No.11261325 [View]
File: 35 KB, 742x426, NASA_budget_linegraph_BH.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11261325

>>11261031
>>11261085
Yes, clearly the big problem facing NASA is wimmin.
Look at all these fake companies sucking up NASA"s budget .
http://www.fi-aeroweb.com/Top-100-NASA-Contractors.html

>> No.9504920 [View]
File: 35 KB, 742x426, NASA_budget_linegraph_BH[1].png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9504920

>>9503876

>Speaking about money, NASA's funding is lowered regularly, while inflation is still a thing.

Wrong, NASA budget is flat when adjusted for inflation.

Contrary to popular belief, the budget of NASA is roughly constant after the Apollo peak ended. It was not defunded, neither by Obama or by republicans.

The failings of NASA have to do with being a huge corrupt bureaucracy and a victim of being a pork barrel for politicians.

There is no actual technical reason why a rocket launch must cost $ hundreds of millions, or why a new rocket must cost tens of billions to develop.

Thank God for SpaceX.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]