/sci/ - Science & Math

>>9419578
Chicanery item #2: Gravitational lensing Pt Un

What is it? Allegedly, it's "light bending around objects." Gravitational lensing is considered THE best evidence for general relativity.

Let's analyse that statement "light bends around objects." So what exactly was the observation? Did we invent a telescope that observes light rays? Did we invest a telescope that can see photons? No. The observation is essentially an eclipse. An opaque object exists between an observer and light source. One would think that the observer would not be able to see the light. But, somehow the observer can see the light. That's the observation. No more, no less.

How that phenomenon has come to be interpreted as "light bends around objects" can be perceived as nothing short of fraud. That's a biased way to interpret it. Scientists went into that observation looking for a result that proves "light bends."

What are scientists leaving out? Tell me, has any scientist told you that gravitational lensing only occurs around hot objects? Probably not. But it's true, an observer will see light from a light source despite an opaque blockade ONLY when the blockade is hot. I encourage you to prove this wrong- find an image of light reaching our galaxy from a distant cold galaxy. It simply does not exist. The only images we have of gravitational lensing occur from the sun and nearby galaxies. Both are hot compared to far away cold galaxies.

Is this not peculiar to you "scientists?" Does this not suggest a more complex mechanic of light evading a blockade than "light bends?" There is something else going on there.