/sci/ - Science & Math

>>12652327
>Oedipus is the final bastion of immuno-politics, and schizophrenia is its outside. This is not to say that it is an exteriority determined by Oedipus, related in a privileged fashion to Oedipus, anticipating Oedipus, or defying Oedipus. It is thoroughly anoedipal, although it will casually consume the entire Oedipal apparatus in the process through which terrestrial history connects with an orphan cosmos. Schizophrenia is not, therefore, a property of clinical schizophrenics, those medical products devastated by an 'artificial schizophrenia, such as one sees in hospitals, the autistic wreck(s) produced as entit(ies). On the contrary, 'the schizo-entity' is a defeated splinter of schizophrenia, pinned down by the rubberized claws of sanity. The conditions of psychiatric observation are carceral, so that it is a transcendental structure of schizophrenia-as-object that it be represented in a state of imprisonment.

>Traditional schemas which oppose technics to nature, to literate culture, or to social relations, are all dominated by a phobic resistance to the sidelining of human intelligence by the coming techno sapiens. Thus one sees the decaying Hegelian socialist heritage clinging with increasing desperation to the theological sentimentalities of praxis, reification, alienation, ethics, autonomy, and other such my themes of human creative sovereignty. A Cartesian howl is raised: people are being treated as things! Rather than as . . . soul, spirit, the subject of history, Dasein? For how long will this infantilism be protracted? (Nick Land)

>>12652271
>The New Latin word autismus (autism) was coined by Eugen Bleuler in 1910 as he was defining symptoms of schizophrenia. He derived it from the Greek word autós ( "self"), and used it to mean morbid self-admiration, referring to "autistic withdrawal of the patient to his fantasies, against which any influence from outside becomes an intolerable disturbance".
https://youtu.be/NPp7bkxY4KI

I'm from /x/ and rare to never come by here, but I do get curious what goes on in this self-limited realm of science. Any general opinion on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism here?

>>10483097
> don't believe there is anything supernatural (as I can attest) that will cause a huge amount of technological superintelligence to happen.
It would be a process of manifesting it from something like hypersigils. Likely of the nervous system technology, advancements in schizophrenia.

>This is to argue that our current world is simply a continuation after all of the previous and existing superpower
Yes, each object of experience formed by the previous process as creator and creation. I think a pancreative paradigm shift will be vital for approaching singularity.