/sci/ - Science & Math

>>7681771
Philosophy is useless and science doesn't need philosophy.

>>7655942

>/lit/

>>7494339
Every major likes to look down on all of the others. Superiority complex. Nothing personal.

That being said,

>/lit/

Science is and always will be our best method of finding and testing explanations for empirical observations. Get rekt, philosotards. Your starbucks degree will never be as useful as science.

>scientism
There's that buzzword again ...

Nobody believes that science is the only method of answering all questions. You don't use science to decide the color of your clothes or the interior design of your car. In their everyday life people rely on intuition and experience all the time. This being said, science is and always will be the most reliable and objective method of finding explanations for observed phenomena. Science answers the questions of "why" and "how". In doing so, it has solved a lot of problems and produced many useful results. Philosophy on the other hand never solved a single problem and never answered a single question. Philosophy wallows in masturbatory pseudo-intellectual fantasies while using big words to describe trivialities everyone has already considered. Now go back to >>>/lit/ and stay butthurt over the fact that your useless starbucks degree will never be comparable to STEM master race.

>>6945594
THIS THREAD

>>6946393
>knowledge from past lives

Please take your stupid bullshit to /x/

>>6944438
>problems in philosophy of science

kek'ed