/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10642320
>who would have thought that you have to wear insulation when working close to high powered device.

Gee I don't know, the power company maybe?

>>10642428
>yet one more thing added to the list that gives Californians "cancer".

Right next to dihydrogen oxide.

>>10643377

Yes they do. That's why they continue to do it. These are not logical people you're dealing with.

>>10643423
>EM
>Emission
No

>>10643454
Tell me what "5G" is and how it works.

>>10479335
>Time.
Circular reasoning

>What time it is.
Does not pertain to the universe

>Admitting the existence of frequency is admitting the existence of time.
>a break in activity is time
No

>No, time is a thing that we measure.
using what? Measurements don't have properties.

>Yep. And?
Non-sequitur

>Something that is merely an absence of something else is a thing.
There is no "something else" in absence. It is absent, like your brain.

>Prove it’ll ever happen.
"the sun"

>Wrong. Space has properties.
???I've only asked about 10 times. No one has named a property yet. Is it cold? Is it hot? Is it wet? Is it dry?

>What time it is.
Circular reasoning, again.

>Don’t need to be.
No they don't, but it's not a distinction without a difference. An explanation would make me take what you have to say seriously.

>Nope. The Buddhist faith was not created by some prehistoric journal.
>what are the sutras

>Sounds just like you.
I am not a part of any group that would have me as a member.

>It’s dimensions.
Space and time have no "dimensionality" because they have no properties. Measurements aren't dimensions, they describe and quantify dimensions.

>>10440676
>only if you knew,

Yeah exactly! If only I knew. If only magical vortex circle could fucking explain how it pertains to reality then maybe I would know. But it doesn't. If it does then:

EXPLAIN
HOW

Fucking numbnuts. "Oh it does math a different way" is not an explanation to ANYTHING that pertains to reality! It quantifies. It tells you how many apples there are, but it doesn't tell you what a fucking apple is. Get it?

>>10391358
>Yes, air. You are literally emitting air. That is literally how talking works.

You are literally retarded. "Sound" is not an emission, it's a change in the density already present you fuckwit. That's like saying you're "emitting" water when you splash your hand in it and make waves. You're not "emitting" jack shit.

>>10391360
one potato ,two potatoes , three potatoes

>>10391366
four. Five potatoes, six potatoes, seven potatoes, more!

>Fucking experimentally prove that light isn't a particle.

How about some empirical evidence of a discrete particle?

>Just show it in an actual experiment.
Then watch the videos that have them then you bovine crab. I just posted two of them and you sit here posting your drivel less than 20 minutes after I post them. Piss off.

>>10360353
>coordinates, distance
A measurement has no properties, try again.

>coordinates, distance
A measurement has no properties, try again.

>what kind of properties are you envisioning? what are you talking about
ANY PROPERTY. IF IT IS DEVOID OF PROPERTIES THEN HOW CAN IT EXIST? HOW DO YOU REIFY WHAT HAS NO PROPERTIES? "Spacetime" has no properties. We can go to round two of "name a property of space and time" again if you'd like.

>but it does have properties, like it being curved by mass/energy,
What is the property it has that allows it to be "curved"? Is it like play-doh? Is it like a

>spacetime being hyperbolic
How can something that has no properties have a shape?

>maybe you should go to school and actually study this stuff sometime?
Maybe you should go figure out what a "property" is and also when it's appropriate to use a question mark.

>>10336488
>>10336494
>>10336498
People who chase shadows are calling others wrong. Literally cannot make this shit up. I'm out.

>>10325230
Which has magnetism you dunderhead.

>>10325235
>You are Dunning-Krugering so hard it's pathetic. You do realize you started saying incomprehensible nonsense as a reply "faster-than-light communication is impossible", and this whole "argument" is just me trying to explain the absolute basics of relativity and electromagnetism to you, right? Again: go read a textbook, this conversation is embarassingly out of your league.

>blah blah pls believe spooky action at a distance is just "spooky".
Just type "no u" next time. I'm not buying into appeal to authority nonsense.

>>10293984

Never said it was or wasn't a closed system. Even in an open system you still need an input, retard. You move shit from where it is to where it isn't and that doesn't happen by fucking magic.

>>10130935
See now you're not even trying. How is anything what I said /x/ related? How about you try answering the question instead?

>Waves of what?

It's a on a spectrum you mongoloid. It's not a "thing" it's what something else is doing, but I guess that's too hard for someone that also thinks that what something does can "travel". The thing "travels" not what that thing is doing, that makes no sense at all. "I wave my hand", "this thing is creating a waving motion". It's a displacement, there is no fucking "traveling" of any wave whatsoever because a wave is not a thing to begin with. It's like saying water and waves of water are two completely different things. No they're still fucking water.

>>10119240

>When you are so ass blasted that the principles of a 2000+ year old triangle destroys an arbitrary language.

But it was arbitrary to begin with, why would you be mad?
"Incommensurability", fucking google it. It stands to reason that a modern day physicist (mathematician) can't understand the meaning, but luckily for you there aren't a group of people who are going to drown you for refusing to understand.