[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.12169938 [View]
File: 71 KB, 600x854, PIA00013-1st-earth-moon-voyager-1-9-18-1977-600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12169938

>>12169903
Jesus Christ what's wrong with you?

>> No.12136559 [View]
File: 71 KB, 600x854, PIA00013-1st-earth-moon-voyager-1-9-18-1977-600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
12136559

>>12136531
I honour the effort you're putting into this, but birthdays are really not that relevant, specially if they displace 75% of the post.
>1977 – Voyager I takes the first distant photograph of the Earth and the Moon together.
Probes doing anything always make my eyes wet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Hbp8QYUQpc

>> No.11747331 [View]
File: 71 KB, 600x854, PIA00013-1st-earth-moon-voyager-1-9-18-1977-600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11747331

i wish we lived in a future age of epic space discovery and colonization, but this is good enough i guess

>> No.10241028 [View]
File: 71 KB, 600x854, PIA00013-1st-earth-moon-voyager-1-9-18-1977-600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10241028

This is making me wonder when NASA is going to jump on board with this. They are basically missing out on the development of cutting edge super heavy lift vehicle for way cheaper than their own shuttle sequel that won't be ready for years....

>> No.10175359 [View]
File: 64 KB, 600x854, PIA00013-1st-earth-moon-voyager-1-9-18-1977-600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10175359

What are the mods doing? These threads are literally /x/ material. There is a designated board for this shit

>> No.10119778 [View]
File: 64 KB, 600x854, PIA00013-1st-earth-moon-voyager-1-9-18-1977-600.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10119778

>>10119722

>>10119735
Not exactly. Dark matter is a separate kind of matter from what most things we observe are made of.
>>10119746
Transparent is misleading. It doesn't interact in any meaningful way with any matter, so it is difficult/impossible to detect.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]