/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16201395
>word salad about ludicrous assumptions
>makes assumption that light always moves at exactly the same speed regardless of external influence

This might make me sound like a brainlet, but I've been thinking about this:

The Big Bang Theory says that the universe expanded from one singular, hot and dense point in space. But heat is the transfer of kinetic energy, so where did that energy come from? How is believing that there was some ever-present "point" in space more rational than believing god always existed? I think trying to discover the universe's origin is like trying to imagine a color you've never seen before. The brain can only fathom what it's already experienced, so trying to imagine a time before existence is futile