/sci/ - Science & Math

>>15980548
It wont be "settled science" until its convenient. Given how big the claim is that could definitely happen. And people are subconsciously scared of how big of a change this is too.

So, science eventually proved that authorities forcing you to wear a cloth on your face was never really about protecting you from a virus, it was always about destroying your health and decreasing your life expectancy. Funny thing is that one can still see retards wearing this in public places, only because mainstream media began to scare with new "covid variants" lately.

> A systematic review of 2,168 studies that looked into the adverse effects of wearing masks during the COVID-19 pandemic has found that the practice led to negative health consequences, including itching, headaches, and restriction of oxygen.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1125150/full

> Wearing face masks to counter COVID-19 provides no significant protective benefit to children, with kids facing potential developmental challenges from masking, according to a recent review of multiple studies.

https://adc.bmj.com/content/early/2023/12/06/archdischild-2023-326215

> People who wore protective masks were found to be more likely to contract COVID-19 infections than those who didn’t, according to a recent Norwegian study.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/0525AD535D10FDCDF0C52603B50E7A1E/S0950268823001826a.pdf/association-between-face-mask-use-and-risk-of-sars-cov-2-infection-cross-sectional-study.pdf