/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10515995
>I have a dead sister thanks to vaccines, she died a few hours after getting them.
post hoc
ergo poptart hoc

>>10103616
Nah, it's photoshopped. This is the original version.

>>10095245

>>9750689
>Surely these things are required beforehand in order for parallax to be accurate.
if you knew ANY geometry, you'd know this is a stupid statement. if you know the distance between your observation points, you can derive the distances to the observed objects.

>What I do know is that the earth is flat, so any evidence that supposedly supports a globe either works on a flat earth or is bullshit. The beauty of fundamental (and true) axioms means you can reject "evidence" that goes against this fundamental axiom.
in other words, if evidence contradicts your opinion, it must be wrong. no amount of evidence, no matter how reliable and conclusive, could ever change your mind.
congratulations; you've admitted that your flat-earth model is unfalsifiable, and therefore unscientific. you may now >>>/x/

>>8995370
>Show me one kind of animal turning into another in observable time.
Nice try, but evolution doesn't have things turning into radically different things. Organisms evolve into things that are slightly different. A worm doesn't turn into a clam; evolutionary biology has never claimed that it does. The only people who think it does are the ignorant, like you.

>>8995394
>It's still corn, though. It's not a rose, or broccoli. It's corn.
Actually, NOW it's corn. Before, it was grass.
>Size and probability are two different things.
And if you knew what the Law of Large Numbers is, you'd understand why one relates to the other.
>"better" is a subjective term that you're applying to a supposedly directionless process.
"reproduce better" means only "leave more offspring". which is a nice objective scale.

>>8995398
>number-dazzling
didn't know you were the kind of troglodyte who's amazed by the word "millions". it's like showing a shiny rock to a monkey.

>>8995413
>Still maize
but it WASN'T maize before. it was fucking grass.

>>8995729
>hurr all the evidence I don't like is fake!!1!

>>8995737
>claiming anything that doesnt fit the convenient explanations of evolutionists. is not real evolution
aaand what did the graphic claim isn't """"really"""" evolution?
>vaccine for cancer
>cure
we cured smallpox, right? how did we cure it? by vaccinating everyone.

>>8995740
>still no transitional fossils
literally every fossil we have is a transitional fossil. see >>8994435

>>8995747
>they still have mice and fruit flies after 30 generation
>you have no proof of any speciation
but they are different KINDS of mice and fruit flies. (and 30 generations is nowhere near enough for speciation to occur.)
speciation doesn't mean a fly turning into a beetle, like you nimrods seem to think. it means something becoming so different that it is reproductively isolated. like the apple maggot
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_maggot

>>8925871
that was photoshopped
pic related is the original tweet

>>8784532
>autism isn't real

>>8753829
>You can still do good science with cheap materials. A lot of lab equipment and supplies are insanely expensive only because the people ordering it have no incentive to keep the costs down. They're spending other people's money, and working with a large budget is something that looks good on their resume.
10g of quinine (90% purity) costs $72 from Sigma-Aldrich. this is sufficient for some fluorescence imaging I'm doing, but I'd need to go to 95 or 99% purity if I were doing any biochemical or medical work with it, which would be significantly more expensive.
quality control and purification cost quite a bit, but they're essential. if any impurity messes with your results, you could end up spending far more time and money chasing a red herring...or if you're in any field related to medicine or engineering, people might actually die. corners cannot be cut in some lines of work. of course, you'd never know this because you have no aptitude or education in a hard science.

>>8753937
>Balfour Declaration and the Holocaust. Nothing else.
don't forget the decline and breakup of the Ottoman Empire

>>8754051
pic

>>8754215
W E W L A D
E W E A D L
W E W D L A
L A D W E W
A D L E W E
D L A W E W

>>8754383
this

>>8754394
you're so busy sucking his cock that you steadfastly refuse to realize that he's breaking all the promises he made to you.

>>8754449
>The wall will pay for itself practically overnight in reduced crime, unemployment, and social program spending.
oh lawd mah drills

>>8745634
telling you that "I capitalize." is a sentence. :^)

arguing with deniers is kind of a surreal experience desu. it seems they don't just reject science that they dislike; apparently, they're disconnected from reality in generall.
by all means continue, senpaialam

>>8706878
>>8706839
pretty much every molecule is going to have some kind of vibration going on if it's not near absolute zero. but the only vibrational modes we care about in this instance are the ones associated with absorption and reemission of infrared light.
you're asking how frequent these absorption events are, because you're skeptical that CO2 actually contributes significantly to the greenhouse effect. as has been pointed out to you over and over, WE KNOW HOW STRONGLY CO2 ABSORBS, BECAUSE THIS HAS BEEN VERIFIED EXPERIMENTALLY.

so how often does CO2 do something that allows it to absorb an IR photon? answer: often enough to make a difference.

>>8690587
>reddit assembled arguments
if you scroll up, you stupid cockholster, you'll see that I introduced it as "the classic evo bio one"

>>8690844
what I don't understand is how he did enough Googling to find the Reddit thread but not enough to find the Wikipedia article talking about how it's a widely known evo bio meme. the Wikipedia article is literally the first result when you Google what I wrote.

>>8646652

>>8599899

> not posting the real tweet

>>8378956