/sci/ - Science & Math

>>16099887
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO this could be used to say mean things about niggers!!! Government needs to crack down on this technology NOOOOOOOOOOOOOW!!!

>but what if the magical elixir of youth is real and someone else will live longer while i die?
>the abstract thought of this makes me shake uncontrollably
>w-w-why aren't you shaking uncontrollably and crying like me?
>y-y-you're insane!!
>kill yourself and p-prove something to me
The most rational anti-aging coper.

>are you afraid of quoting me directly??
>why didn't you give me a (You)?
>y-y-you're afraid of me!
>g-give me my (You)!!!!

>It's really funny how those anti-materialist idealist Kastrup cultists are exactly what they accuse "soience worshippers" to be

>>another philosophy thread on sci
>Philosophy is not science or math. It's bullshit non-sense for christards, hippies, and brainlet pseuds who are too stupid to understand modern science, but want to create the impression of being intelligent.
>Next time you feel the need to schizo post or you want to make another thread about muh consciousness or muh philosophy, please do so on >>>/lit/, >>>/x/, >>>/pol/, or one of the many other boards that would be more suitable for this type of discussion. If anything, sci is literally the LAST board where you should be posting about philosophy, since philosophy is in many way antithetical to modern science. Of course, there are exceptions (pretty much all of them from hundreds or thousands of years ago), but the vast majority of philosophers have basically been science deniers and even explcitily anti-science. Posting about philosophy on a science board is like asking what religion is the most "scientific". Neither philosophical nor relgious discussions or debates have a place on sci.

>>15258405
>muh imaginary /pol/ boogeyman
Exposed again. You and your kind are undersirable here. Go back.

>>15258052
>i'm le heckin' making fun of you!!
if only your friends were here to updoot you. are your imaginary friends laughing? i know you're not laughing :^)

>and again
>hilarious
>keep trying
This animal is just losing its mind with rage.

>Whenever you get to know an anti druggie, it is always some angry depressed or suicidal boomer

>we think you're dumm!
>we're all laughing at you right now!
>r-right guys
>we're all thinking bad things about you!
>aren't you embarrassed??
>we will never forget how much you made us seethe!
holy cringe. good job riling him up

>>15125613
>The natural birthing process is a risk for women.
So?

>are you happy about that because you're 16 years old or because you're a pedophile?
Mentally ill golems will continue to seethe.

>I've seen how absolute abusive monsters of human beings that conservative ideology turns people into in my real life. Conservativism destroys families and communities.
Well-done if troll.

>>15086010
>The feeling of free will is an illusion
Prove it.

>>15066782
>Where did science ever use something found by philosophers?
Science is a product of philosophy, mouth breather. Come back when you finish middle school.

>If this was "dogma" you should have some argument or evidence against it.
Absolutely obsessed.

>You are legitimately committing crimes constantly trying to make fake medical diagnosis without proper accreditation
Deranged...

>>14981679
>You have been radicalized
Why is that bad?

>ummm sweaty, I can't prove that what I """know""" is true and everything would look exactly the same if it was false, but it's still """knowledge""", okay???

>we're done here!!
Too bad, I thought someone was going to explain to me how false-flag terrorist attacks against Europeans defending against Putin.

>>14977040
But how do you know benis shrinks when it's cold without peer-reviewed research on it? Read Prandlt, von Kármán, and Ackeret. I would have you fucking KILLED for this post.

>>14969422
>y-y-you've l-l-lost
Notice how you kept replying when I was merely insulting you, but stopped replying as soon as I've pointed logically why your argument is worthless. :^)

>Dude you keep making this more complicated than it has to be.
>Humans perceive patterns, sometimes too much. That still doesn't mean I'm gonna believe the first fucking magician that crosses my path. That is literally everything I'm saying.
>I'm not telling you to stop seeing patterns, or to stop thinking you're seeing them. I'm telling you whatever mystical interpretation Jung gives you about these things is in no way better than any other magician you choose to follow, and I'm also telling you you don't HAVE to follow magicians.
I feel kinda bad for the guy trying to patiently reason with this creature.

>>14852992
>there is nothing a human can do or create that my purely imaginary sci-fi entity from the future couldn't do better!!