/sci/ - Science & Math

>>2659389
I have the urge to say "define normal", but thats just going back along with "its what the majority deems as right/wrong, or is made to believe is right or wrong. and it is indeed possible to not be able to function as a biological and mortal being. You know, if we could achieve some state where we were relieved of things like requisites that go along with being a carbon-based lifeform, what sorts of feats could we accomplish with perception alteration or similar, to some extreme. Though rereading this over, I'm practically saying killing yourself is the way to go, not quite what I intend.

Things can happen in the real world that can hurt you and make you die. How can you have a subjective experience of anything, without an underlying reality? I accept "reality" is real, but everything I know about it is subjective and deeply flawed so I don't take my opinions or perceptions too seriously. We use words to describe and form opinions of things, and we use words to let us know what the words mean. Its pretty silly.

>>2348081

Send me an e-mail, blueshift.

Perhaps I can interest you in my life goal.

Perhaps one day, we will work together.