/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5284724
Honestly, I find many egalitarians to be just as much of a threat to science as the average creationist.

Seriously, after spending years on the internet I have come to the conclusion that liberals are as much of a threat to scientific truth as much as your average creationist, or worse considering how much influence they have in modern academia.

>ITT

>>5113485
lel, liberals

Whenever you hear a liberal or White-guilted cultural Marxist deny racial differences, just post a link to this

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study

and observe their reaction, their inability to say anything rational and their butt getting infinitely mad.

You people are fucking delusional.

>>4825813
The asians do have a slightly higher IQ than whites, but IQ in itself isn't EVERYTHING. The cultural and scientific achievments of the white man speaks for itself.

Because of this, anon.

>>4188349
not this person but adding on.

this thread summed up

>>3661552
>there is only one rule
hyuk hyuk hyuk hyuk hyuk

I've been banned before for posting threads calmly refuting things like the image on the rights' usage as evidence for a genetic component to racism. If anyone should be pissed, I should. And yet, I'm not.

>>3636687
>One person's unsourced anecdote disproves decades of intelligence testing

Wow, you don't know how science works do you? Maybe you should go back to /soc/

Race dump. No, I won't be debating the people who assume races are equal without evidence.

Yes, this is science

This one's pretty bad
-Can't find any 1996 APA report matching the description of the first (could just be me)
-MTAS had flaws, including the fact that
>At the time they joined their new families, for example, the Black adoptees had had more prior placements, rated of poorer quality, than their White counterparts. This was especially the case for the children with two Black birth parents, who were not adopted until they were, on average, about 32 months old. Because any later IQ differences between these groups may have resulted from differences in preadoptive experience, the Minnesota data provide no clear evidence for the genetic hypothesis.
Sauce:http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~maccoun/PP279_Neisser2.html
-Brain size and Intelligence aren't closely correlated, while neuron density is. If anyone information on density, do want.

>>3539434
same poster.
Also, this pic is relevant because of it's truthfulness.