/sci/ - Science & Math

>>8996035
>You ARE making shit up.
He altered the pelvis

>that's one limp-dick non sequitur if ever I saw one
I'm saying your data is biased, and you are wrong. That simple.

>that's where you're wrong, kiddo.
That was magic, not science.

>I am not responsible for your jaw-dropping ignorance.
Despite their massive jaws, large nuchal crest, and high nuchal crest?

>...the ability of other apes
Despite being about (proportionally) half the size of ours?

>meaningless babble.
My case still stands.

>So you admit that "common sense" has failed you before?
Observable science=common sense
Historical science=biased interpretation

>there's nothing ambiguous about early human trackways that clearly show bipedal locomotion.
Despite the fact that STW 573 has feet nearly identical to those of chimps?

>your whole argument comes down to "you can't know nuffin".
I don't claim to know everything, unlike those high-falootin scientists

>nice pic, by the way.
Every skull found thus far is too fragmentary, or too low to be that of an ape-man