[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

Search:


View post   

>> No.9353951 [View]
File: 1.11 MB, 1548x1024, taylor-swift-live-smile-2015-billboard-1548.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9353951

Should compsci (undergrad) be integrated into (applied) math curriculum?

I feel like my uni puts way too much emphasis on programming, which is a skill in itself, but too little on math/theory. We don't even have distinct math classes while other unis do. Things like linalg, real analysis, calculus, etc., are only presented in condensed form and integrated into courses like graphics, 3d modelling, (advanced) algorithms, etc.

Do note that some unis, not necessarily technical ones, do provide these distinct math courses (maybe shared with math department?).

The issue I run into is that the curriculum is good for regular software engineers who want to go into industry. However, if I want to do proper research in compsci, I'm gonna have to go against mathfags who have way more rigour in math and therefore theoretical CS. I'm going against the hill here and being better in programming will not last forever.

What do you think of this awkward split between programming and theory? I'm thinking of making CS more math heavy, or even fusing it with math, and then making a seperate degree like software engineering where it's more about programming and some softer skills oriented around business theory.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]